At youth group a few months ago, we were discussing evolution. My friend had a very interesting theory about how inaccurate scientists can be. When archaeologists(sp?) find new bones, they only have a few ways of testing them to see how old they are. One technique they use is looking at how many layers of rock and soil to estimate how old it is, therefore figuring out how old the bone(s) is/are.
When Noah built the ark and the flood came, what do you think the other animals and people (who weren't on the ark) did? Most likely, they traveled as fast as they could to get to a higher altitude. So, those bones would be a lot "newer" than a scientist would conclude.

I just thought I should share that because I thought it was interesting. It made me think...

How about you guys? Agree? Disagree?

_________________
It's hard to stumble. when you're on your knees.

that is sort of cool i mean it's human nature,

_________________
God rocks and so does wp

Many scientists who study evolution agree that it is scientifically probable that there would have to have been some kind of maker to start off the chain of events.

so they do think that some of them

_________________
God rocks and so does wp